Skip to content

Search result

    Showing results 171 - 180 of 274

    Quality policy

    Statistics Denmark is a professionally and politically independent institution developing, producing and publishing statistics on society. Statistics Denmark produces impartial and objective statistics in accordance with recognised methods and statistical procedures. Furthermore, Statistics Denmark ensures statistical confidentiality. Our goal is for the statistics to be accurate and reliable, coherent and comparable., Statistics Denmark defines the statistics on the basis of users’ needs, publish them timely and punctually and aim to present them in a clear and understandable way. To this end, Statistics Denmark’s professional independence is specified by law, cf. Act on Statistics Denmark, and it is ensured that the staff has adequate education, training and experience to accommodate the current statistical requirements., Statistics Denmark produces and disseminates official statistics and ensures coherence within and between the statistics, including comparability over time and geographical areas. To the widest extent possible, existing administrative sources are used to minimise the reporting burden on enterprises and citizens., Statistics Denmark emphasises good service, efficiency and cost-effectiveness to fulfil the increasing national and international requests. Statistics Denmark participates in the international cooperation and meets the requirements to the European statistical system., Statistics Denmark is working according to well-defined methods and plans. Quality indicators and other important factors concerning processes and products are well-defined, and outputs are monitored in accordance with these. If the quality indicators are not satisfactory, changes and improvements of processes and procedures will be implemented., Statistics Denmark’s quality system is based on the 16 principles in the European statistics Code of Practice, as published by Eurostat:, Professional independence, 1bis Coordination and cooperation, Mandate for data collection and access to data, Adequacy of resources, Commitment to quality, Statistical confidentiality and data protection, Impartiality and objectivity, Sound Methodology, Appropriate statistical procedures, Non-excessive burden on respondents, Cost-effectiveness, Relevance, Accuracy and reliability, Timeliness and punctuality, Coherence and comparability, Accessibility and clarity

    https://www.dst.dk/en/OmDS/kvalitet-og-styring/kvalitet-for-statistikproduktion/kvalitetspolitik

    Joint Data Responsibility

    At Denmark Statistics (DST), we offer users under the Researcher Scheme the option to enter into ‘Joint Data Responsibility’, which enables collaboration on a single project between two authorised institutions, where responsibility for the data is shared equally., The project is created under one authorised institution, and users affiliated with the second authorised institution, who are to participate in the project, are linked via a user and association agreement. Both institutions must confirm via email to the contact person in Denmark's Data Portal that they wish to establish a project under joint data responsibility between [authorisation number – name of institution 1] and [authorisation number – name of institution 2] for project [project number]., In addition, it must be clearly stated in the project description that the project has been confirmed and approved for joint data responsibility between the two institutions., Sanction Framework for Projects under Joint Data Responsibility, In the event of a breach of DST’s rules for working with microdata, institutions with projects under joint data responsibility are subject to the applicable sanction system specified for projects under the Researcher Scheme on DST’s website: , Sanction Rules., Sanctions Affect Both User and Project Simultaneously, If a breach of DST’s rules for working with microdata occurs in projects under joint data responsibility, it may result in sanctions against the user who has transfered the data. For example, DST may decide that the user is sanctioned with a quarantine period during which the individual user does not have access to the DDV App. This sanction will also affect the relevant project from which the data was extracted, meaning that all access to the project will be closed for the same quarantine period that applies to the user who transfered the data., Thus, the sanction policy does not differ from the applicable sanction rules for projects and users without joint data responsibility., Institution-Level Sanctions Affect Both Institutions, The sanction framework for institutions likewise follows DST’s applicable sanction rules. Accordingly, both institutions must report when a breach occurs, and repeated or serious breaches may result in measures such as temporary or permanent closure., In line with the applicable sanction framework, the sanctioning process will take into account the history of the two institutions. This means that the same offense may affect institutions differently if one institution has a long history of breaches while the other has not previously violated the rules., Institutions must account for errors in data transfer as per normal practice and must indicate that the project is subject to joint data responsibility, so that Denmark's Data Portal transfer team can take this into account when processing any potential breaches.

    https://www.dst.dk/en/TilSalg/data-til-forskning/anmodning-om-data/faelles-dataansvar